New Mexico State Law Summary |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last updated August 22, 2006. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Article II, § 6 of the New Mexico Constitution provides:
In State v. Rivera, 853 P.2d 126 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993), the Court of Appeals of New Mexico held that regulations that are reasonably related to the public health, welfare and safety do not violate art. II, § 6. The court found that N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-7-4, which criminalizes negligent use of a deadly weapon, was a reasonable use of the state’s police power and did not violate the state constitution. Rivera, 853 P.2d at 129. Similarly, in State v. Dees, 669 P.2d 261, 264 (N.M. Ct. App. 1983), the court of appeals rejected an art. II, § 6 challenge to section 30-7-3, prohibiting the carrying of a firearm into a licensed liquor establishment. The court found that section 30-7-3 is "not an infringement upon the right to bear arms." Dees, 669 P.2d at 264. Conversely, in City of Las Vegas v. Moberg, 485 P.2d 737 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971), the court of appeals held that a local ordinance banning the carrying of all firearms, concealed or unconcealed, violated art. II, § 6. In Moberg, the court distinguished between laws that merely regulate the carrying of firearms, and laws that completely prohibit the carrying of firearms. Id. at 738. The court stated that a law prohibiting the carrying of concealed firearms is a permissible regulation of art. II, § 6. The ordinance at issue, however, prohibited the carrying of all firearms and was therefore a violation of art. II, § 6. Id. See also United States v. Romero, 484 F.2d 1324, 1327 (10th Cir. 1973), in which the court stated, in dicta, that the right conferred under art. II, § 6 is not absolute and is subject to reasonable regulation. In 2004, the Supreme Court of New Mexico interpreted the meaning of the last phrase of the first sentence of art. II, § 6, which reads "nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons." State ex rel. New Mexico Voices for Children, Inc. v. Denko, 2004-NMSC-11, 135 N.M. 439, 90 P.3d 458. The court upheld a statute allowing license holders to carry concealed handguns (section 29-19-4 et seq.), rejecting the argument that the phrase prohibits the carrying of concealed weapons. Id. at ¶¶ 5-13. The court held:
Id. at ¶ 8. See the New Mexico Preemption Section for cases that have analyzed the preemptive effect of art. II, § 6. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The police power of municipalities and counties in New Mexico is limited in the area of firearms regulation. The following sentence was added to N.M Const. art. II, § 6 in 1986: "No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms." In Baca v. New Mexico Dept. of Public Safety, 2002-NMSC-017, 132 N.M. 282, 47 P.3d 441, the Supreme Court of New Mexico held that New Mexico Statutes § 29-18-11(D) (subsequently repealed), which delegated authority to local governments to disallow the carrying of concealed handguns, violated art. II, § 6. According to the supreme court, art. II, § 6 indicates the state’s intent to have uniform firearms regulation throughout the state, rather than piecemeal local regulation. Baca, 2002-NMSC-017, ¶ 6. The court concluded that the manner in which a person bears a weapon is an "incident of the right to keep and bear arms" under art. II, § 6. Id. at ¶ 7. The only other interpretation of the preemptive effect of art. II, § 6 is set forth in an opinion of the Attorney General. The Attorney General has opined that prior to the adoption of the last sentence in art. II, § 6 in 1986, local governments had police power authority to enact reasonable firearms regulations, but that art. II, § 6 removed that authority. Op. Att’y Gen. No. 90-07 (1990), 1990 N.M. AG LEXIS 5. Further, the opinion defines an art. II, § 6 "‘incident’ of the right to bear and keep arms" to include the transfer of weapons. Id. at *4-*5. The provisions of New Mexico’s Sport Shooting Range Act (N.M. Stat. Ann. § 17-8-1 et seq.) "shall not prohibit" a local government from regulating the location and construction of sport shooting ranges after July 1, 2002. Section 17-8-5. Please see the Preemption section of the Master List of Firearms Policies for a general discussion of this issue, as well as the Federal Preemption section of the Federal Law Summary page. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Deaths and Injuries In 2003, 326 people died from firearm-related injuries in New Mexico. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, WISQARS Injury Mortality Reports, 1999-2002, at http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_sy.html. Federally Licensed Firearms Dealers In 2001, there were 983 federally licensed firearms dealers in New Mexico. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Firearms Commerce in the United States, 2001-2002, Exhibit 13 (2001). Registered Machine Guns In 2000, 2,964 machine guns were registered in New Mexico pursuant to the National Firearms Act. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Firearms Commerce in the United States, 2001-2002, Exhibit 9 (2001). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Phoenix Field Division (AZ, CO, NM, UT, WY) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Questions / Comments about this site? | Copyright© 2008 Legal Community Against Violence | Legal Disclaimer |